← Search

Dana Jones

Phoenix, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
355 matches · 164W–191L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Dana Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history355 matches
L
2026-09-11 · 4.0 KIW2 Shark Mode X18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hirotomo Nakazawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · 4.0 PAS1 Deglane/Unrein W18F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · 4.0 PAS1 Deglane/Unrein W18F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-25 · 4.0 PAS1 Deglane/Unrein W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Rand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-24 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hirotomo Nakazawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · 4.0 PAS Rook-Warriors W40S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-4
W
2026-04-08 · 4.0 PAS Rook-Warriors W40S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Leonetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · 4.0 PAS Rook-Warriors W40S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-27 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hirotomo Nakazawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-24 · 4.0 PAS UnreinDeglane W18S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-20 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Madrid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-06 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Madrid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
71.3%
82W–33L · 59.5% of games
4.0
35%
55W–102L · 45.1% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.9% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.3% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
11W–22L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 46% of the time
#1 Singles
46%
164 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
61 matches
#2 Singles
16%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert