← Search

Linda Huffman

— year-end
65 matches · 36W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Linda Huffman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Julie Moss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
Maria Schneider / Brittany Tarver
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Claire Chiara championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Priscilla Bailey-Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · LEON/Huffman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Seaquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
Debbie Hall / Andrea Gale
2026-07-06 · LEON/Huffman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Chiara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · LEON/Huffman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Chiara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · Wainner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ira Schoffel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · Macko · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Klucher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Ginny Yearty / Stephanie McCann
2026-03-10 · Leon/Huffman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Knapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · Macko · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Murdock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-26 · Macko · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary MacKo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · Macko · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Klucher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 57.8% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 61.1% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#3 Mixed Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer