← Search

Jill Rogers Fitch

San Antonio, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 82W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jill Rogers Fitch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Blossom Mixto · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas McKee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-29 · Blossom Mixto · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sundy Muniz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · Blossom Mixto · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas McKee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Blossom Mixto · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Spears mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · Lynn's Chicas · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bridget Noack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-12 · Lynn's Chicas · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Catherine Babbitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · A Winning Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tess Gutierrez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-1
W
2026-05-30 · Spin Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Decas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · Spin Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronica Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · Spin Sisters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronica Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · Spin Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Decas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · Alamo Heights Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bertie Mzyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
80.5%
70W–17L · 60% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.4% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams