← Search

Willem Mager

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 60W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Willem Mager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-08-08 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Jamison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Jamison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Jamison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-08 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Jahnke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-10 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stanley Cernosek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Mcdowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-21 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Michael Cotta / Eric Stoll
2026-02-07 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Abernathy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-24 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Gettmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 52.5% of games
3.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 51.8% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.4% of games
7.0
70%
14W–6L · 59.2% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King