← Search

Lisa Cloeter

— year-end
85 matches · 30W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Cloeter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-05-02 · Paulk-Beere/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Carr/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margie Story
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Carr/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marian Knaust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Paulk-Beere/Centerton/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Ririe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · Paulk-Beere/Centerton/KTC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Shideler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-14 · Paulk-Beere/Centerton/KTC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Shideler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-06 · Paulk-Beere/Centerton/KTC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Kavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W
Kelly Johnson / Penny Churchill
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Kavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-27 · Zapp/Bella Vista · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Lienhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-26 · Zapp/Bella Vista · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Lienhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
21W–21L · 49.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 23.8% of games
6.0
25%
4W–12L · 39.7% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams