← Search

Eva Nemeth Fredericks

Farmingdale, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 28W–17L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Eva Nemeth Fredericks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Cimetta championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Janeen McFarlane championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Janeen McFarlane championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · LI: Deer Park, Taylor/Dikman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hillary Bekelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jonat Lok championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Georgi Yanchev championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Lauren Borowick / Surinder Singh
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Tatara championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · Deer Park, Patel/Bunting · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Kee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · Deer Park, Patel/Bunting · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Kee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · LI: Deer Park, Taylor/Dikman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.6% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams