← Search

Dana Brazer

Monroe Township, NJ
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
27 matches · 9W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Brazer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2026-02-28 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara Wilmot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Steimle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-22 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Steimle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-08 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara Wilmot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-18 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Neil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2024-05-01 · High Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nanci Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-09 · High Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Steimle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2023-07-26 · High Strung · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Haderer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-2, 1-0
L
2023-05-31 · High Strung · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mara Wilmot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2023-05-10 · High Strung · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Steimle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-06-22 · PRC Lovely Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mara Wilmot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-08 · PRC Lovely Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Haderer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.6% of games
3.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 40.4% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert