← Search

Kathleen Harvey

Arvada, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
409 matches · 144W–265L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Harvey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history409 matches
L
Tia Bach / Sara Jensen
2026-08-17 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Sassler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sean Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Sassler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Maggie Gomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carissa Zook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sean Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Villa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacqueline Marquis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Coulson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dorelle Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-24 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
49.2%
64W–66L · 48% of games
3.0
15.6%
21W–114L · 35.3% of games
6.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.9% of games
5.5mixed
50%
13W–13L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
52.9%
36W–32L · 51.8% of games
6.5mixed
12.5%
2W–14L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
157 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
129 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
115 matches
#1 Singles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe