← Search

Cathy Foreman

Gatesville, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 22W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cathy Foreman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-04-28 · Quick · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Hedin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Deedee Albertin / Tammy Laughlin
2026-03-31 · Quick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · Digby · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bittenbinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · Digby · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Penny Digby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-18 · Rahm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Bittenbinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-18 · Rahm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Moger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
Kirsten Hancock / Natalie Hatch
2026-03-17 · Quick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Penny Digby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-14 · Digby · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bittenbinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-08 · Digby · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat Haygood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-23 · Hancock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Penny Digby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
Brittney Corley / Jennifer Crow
2026-02-11 · Hancock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorcas Gonzales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy Hedderly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.7% of games
4.0
24.2%
8W–25L · 42.2% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer