← Search

David Mogensen

LITCHFIELD PARK, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
319 matches · 143W–176L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Mogensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history319 matches
L
2025-09-08 · 3.5 WIG WIGGY M40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-07 · 3.5 WIG WIGWAM WIGGY WIGGY X40F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Mogensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-05 · 3.5 WIG Ramsey X18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Mogensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
Roger Riviere / Michael Burns
2025-08-05 · 7.5 WIG Wiggy 7.5 Tues · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Cooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-24 · 7.5 WIG Wiggy 7.5 Tues · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Grant Neiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-06 · 7.0 WIG WIGWAM X40S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teri Mogensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-31 · 3.5 WIG Neiss M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark della Paolera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-30 · 7.0 WIG WIGWAM X40S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teri Mogensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-23 · 7.0 WIG WIGWAM X40S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teri Mogensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-22 · 7.0 WIG WIGWAM X40S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teri Mogensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-03-17 · 3.5 WIG Neiss M40S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark della Paolera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-16 · 7.0 WIG WIGWAM X40S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teri Mogensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
42.1%
51W–70L · 48.7% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.9% of games
7.0
48.4%
30W–32L · 49% of games
7.5
20%
3W–12L · 38.9% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
51.5%
52W–49L · 50.5% of games
7.5mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
128 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
116 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
72 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams