← Search

Betty Angelucci

Berwyn, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
371 matches · 111W–260L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Betty Angelucci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history371 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Zecca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-29 · Unmatchables · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larisa Bevan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marrijo Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Unmatchables · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Garlepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Unmatchables · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gokcen Gurk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Mid-Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Net Nuts Spring 2026 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Kraut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · Net Nuts Spring 2026 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn McNeil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · Tight Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn McNeil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · Idle Power · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anat Greener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-05-29 · Idle Power · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Gallis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.6% of games
3.5
26.8%
48W–131L · 41.2% of games
4.0
15.4%
6W–33L · 35.5% of games
7.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 46.1% of games
8.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 34.2% of games
7.0mixed
44.7%
42W–52L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
164 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
102 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
90 matches
#1 Singles
3%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams