← Search

David Lynch

Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 32W–24L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add David Lynch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Rodgers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Highland Park - O'Brien/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benton Weinacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · Life Time - Strickland/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
Jonathan Chen / Russell Scott
2026-05-20 · Highland Park - O'Brien/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lukus Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · Life Time - Strickland/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · Life Time - Strickland/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Strickland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Wallace mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-24 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-17 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-05 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-09 · BH - Nace/ Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Rodgers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.5% of games
4.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.9% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#2 Singles
21%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer