← Search

Brad Hales

Bowling Green, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 9W–9L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brad Hales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-05-27 · KY/BG/GILLOCK · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
W
2026-05-17 · KY/BG/HALES · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Kickert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
Britt Decker / Jonathan Engel
2026-05-17 · KY/BG/HALES · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradley Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Rodney Beeler / Jack Cline
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Jack Cline / Rodney Beeler
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-09-22 · KY/BG/JONES · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brent Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-09-22 · KY/BG/JONES · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brent Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2024-05-30 · KY/PUR/ALLEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-05-30 · KY/PUR/ALLEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Shaun Skelton / Britt Decker
2024-05-04 · KY/BG/HALES · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-05-04 · KY/BG/HALES · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milton Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-05-06 · KY/BG/BARNWELL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Gillock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50%
8W–8L · 53.7% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#2 Singles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer