← Search

Gwen Olsen

LITTLETON, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 76W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gwen Olsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-06 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Naylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Naylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · SS-LGT NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · PCRK RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Hetherington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · PCRK RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janelle Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · PCRK RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Burney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-11 · LEBTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-06-06 · PCRK RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shari Procopio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Pawel Mankowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-06-04 · LEBTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 45.3% of games
3.5
56.2%
36W–28L · 53.5% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 57.8% of games
8.0
10%
1W–9L · 34.2% of games
7.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 55.2% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert