← Search

Senthil Subramoniam

WAXHAW, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 52W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Senthil Subramoniam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-07-15 · RThyagarajan (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sourav Basu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-08 · RThyagarajan (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sourav Basu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · RThyagarajan (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sourav Basu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-27 · RThyagarajan (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sourav Basu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · JOlmstead (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chandrasekar Swaminathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-02 · RMarks/KMahalingam (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ricky Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-30 · JOlmstead (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sourav Basu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-22 · JOlmstead (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jed Levitas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-19 · RMarks/KMahalingam (Blakeney) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-19 · RGogate/BHood (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumit Gahlawat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-12 · RMarks/KMahalingam (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roderick Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-10 · RGogate/BHood (Blakeney) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 54.8% of games
4.0
47.7%
21W–23L · 47.8% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.3% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.9% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#1 Singles
11%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer