← Search

Zachary Wright

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
319 matches · 177W–142L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Zachary Wright to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history319 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Wright 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Howe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Wright 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Sohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · MAC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · Wright 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Sohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Wright 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alejandro Kitzis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Wright 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Sohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · MAC-Inkpen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Inkpen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · MAC-Inkpen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Inkpen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · MAC-Inkpen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · PTC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams119 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
59.5%
50W–34L · 53% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.2% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 63.6% of games
7.0
52%
13W–12L · 52.1% of games
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.3% of games
6.0mixed
76%
19W–6L · 63.8% of games
7.0mixed
62.3%
43W–26L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
11W–22L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
149 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
80 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert