← Search

Rebecca Cook

— year-end
19 matches · 11W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-06-18 · BCC - Thomsic - Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allegra Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · BCC - Cook - Smash Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Chalk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · BCC - Thomsic - Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-02 · BCC - Cook - Smash Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allegra Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · BCC - Cook - Smash Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allegra Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-18 · BCC - Cook - Smash Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allegra Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · BCC - Thomsic - Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allegra Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-06 · BCC - Cook - Smash Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allegra Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · BCC - Cook - Smash Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allegra Helms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · BCC - Thomsic - Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Piper Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-07 · Lusher - BCC Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Cook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · Lusher - BCC Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Cook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer