Karen Hellinger
128 matches · 42W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Karen Hellinger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history128 matches
W
Denise Cleveland / Lalitha Sayed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Penny Gregory / Sherri Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Amy Hoover / Wendy Sather
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Melissa Rapp / Tammy McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
Rosie Roselle / Pam Joachim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Kristina Robertson / Courtney Todd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams8 teams · 2026–2026
NIN FW 18&O 3.0 W: WW Heastan
NIN FW 18&O 3.5 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente
NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 W: Heastan/Markley
NIN FW 40&O 3.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Diamente
NIN FW 40&O 3.5 W: WW Rosales/Dormeier
NIN FW A 55&O 6.0 W: FWCC Bormann/Markley
NIN FW A 65&O 6.0 W: WW Heastan
NIN FW Combo 6.5 W: WW Rosales
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.4% of games
3.5
15.6%
10W–54L · 36.8% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 32.6% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 57.4% of games
6.5
25%
3W–9L · 42.9% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 47.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#1 Singles
9%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.