← Search

Richard Goods

— year-end
65 matches · 23W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Richard Goods to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Premier - 55+ 8.0 M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Mendelowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · Premier - 55+ 8.0 M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Mendelowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · Premier - 55+ 8.0 M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Mendelowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Premier - 55+ 8.0 M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hamed Nafa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Premier - 55+ 8.0 M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hamed Nafa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · Premier - 55+ 8.0 M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Mendelowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-30 · Premier Athletic Club: Zingers 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hamed Nafa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-07-28 · Premier Athletic Club: Zingers 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Mendelowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-21 · Premier Athletic Club: Zingers 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hamed Nafa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-16 · Premier Athletic Club: Zingers 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hamed Nafa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Cheenu Srinivasan / Halvard Kvaale
2025-07-15 · Premier Athletic Club · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Dayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-08 · Premier Athletic Club · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Mendelowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.9% of games
4.0
29%
9W–22L · 40.8% of games
8.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.2% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer