← Search

Caitlin McDonough

Madison, CT
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 53W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caitlin McDonough to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-05-16 · GF: Fire & Ice: Woods/Farrington · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Farrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · GF:Murph & The Alley Cats:Cappetta/Murphy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Cheng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · RH:Baronessess:Baron/Baron · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jannine Leshem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · GF: Fire & Ice: Woods/Farrington · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-21 · GF:Murph & The Alley Cats:Cappetta/Murphy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Cheng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6
W
2026-03-20 · GF:Murph & The Alley Cats:Cappetta/Murphy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Woodward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · GF: You Got Murphed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Cheng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · GF:Guilford Gamers:Ponvert/Woods · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Panico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · GF: You Got Murphed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samuel Markle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-01-30 · GF: You Got Murphed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samuel Markle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-01-11 · GF:Tennis Emergency:Breeden/Ponvert · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-1
L
2025-12-07 · GF:Guilford Gamers:Ponvert/Woods · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celia Ponvert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.1% of games
4.0
46.2%
24W–28L · 50.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.6%
17W–12L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams