← Search

Yoko Sano

— year-end
105 matches · 56W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Yoko Sano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-07-20 · WOB:Netchix:Bojsen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gauri Bhide
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · WOB:Netchix:Bojsen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gauri Bhide
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · SFT:Wonder Women:Koontz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Sollars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · WOB:Netchix:Bojsen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Colby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Kathryn Barton / Judith Luff
2026-06-16 · SFT:Wonder Women:Koontz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirley Ciccolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · WOB:Netchix:Bojsen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gauri Bhide
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
Gail Guinasso / Sharon Fredette
2026-06-02 · SFT:Wonder Women:Koontz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Shea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · SFT:Wonder Women:Koontz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Sollars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · WOB:Netchix:Bojsen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Roginsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · SFT:Spark Red:Klebe · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Pickersgill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-03 · SFT:Spark Red:Klebe · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with SIDI NIU mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-20 · SFT:Spark Red:Klebe · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with PAUL HINOSTROZA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 44.5% of games
6.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 61.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer