← Search

Lisa McCausland

Centennial, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 52W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa McCausland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
W
2026-08-23 · HG TEAL · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mark Custer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-17 · HG YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeni Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · HG YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Custer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-13 · SS-H TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Rampley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Lisa McCausland - * / Ted McCausland - *
2026-07-12 · HG TEAL · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brett Nickerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · RRTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Custer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · SS-H TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Langman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · HG YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ted McCausland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · SS-H TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Svendsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-21 · HG YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ted McCausland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · HG GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Custer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · SS-H TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Custer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.8% of games
3.0
34.9%
37W–69L · 46% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.5% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova