← Search

Brooke Abee

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 57W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brooke Abee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Ch.Kopp40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tyler Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-31 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · Ch.Kopp40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charlotte Kopp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-05 · Cr.Smith18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Maynard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-22 · Ju.Kelly40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-15 · Ju.Kelly40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Donovan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-24 · Cr.Smith18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-03-11 · Ju.Kelly40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-16 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alex van Staveren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-02 · Cr.Smith18C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Lekan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Carol Vervaert / Christine Martin
2025-08-20 · Ch.Kopp40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Pace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 58.3% of games
3.5
50%
17W–17L · 49.4% of games
6.5
55%
11W–9L · 50.4% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 33.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer