← Search

Craig Hoeltgen

Erie, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 99W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Craig Hoeltgen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-08-20 · CVTA BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · CVTA BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Ohlsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · LTC-M GREEN · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Michelle Mathiesen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with AJ Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Chelsea Crowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Brian Nelson / Stephanie Skarwecki
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Chelsea Crowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · LTC-M GREEN · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Michelle Mathiesen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christine LaBerge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-02 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Schifle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chelsea Crowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Connor Ohlsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
72.8%
59W–22L · 59.2% of games
8.5mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.9% of games
9.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 58% of games
9.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
46 matches
#1 Male Doubles
12%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams