← Search

Christopher Rogowski

Evanston, IL
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 27W–35L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Christopher Rogowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2023-06-21 · NITA S 35M40c River Trails (Rogowski/Bhat) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Paterakos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-17 · CDTA S 18&OM3.5 d.Centennial Lado Sat 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juan Lado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2023-04-29 · NITA W 35M40b River Trails (Rogowski) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Paterakos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-04-23 · NITA W 35M40b River Trails (Rogowski) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Nimietz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-15 · NITA W 35M40b River Trails (Rogowski) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Billy Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5, 0-1
L
2023-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carlos del Moral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-04-02 · NITA W 35M40b River Trails (Rogowski) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Paterakos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Caughran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
L
2023-03-26 · NITA W 35M40b River Trails (Rogowski) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Huneck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2023-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Youngbin Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-03-05 · NITA W 35M40b River Trails (Rogowski) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phil Magid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
46.7%
21W–24L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.1% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer