← Search

Reeve Cabral

— year-end
98 matches · 36W–62L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Reeve Cabral to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-09-03 · MTC - McPhillips · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russell Goode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · MTC - Wallace · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregory Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
L
2026-08-27 · MTC - McPhillips · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · MTC - Wallace · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregory Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · MTC - McPhillips · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · MTC - Wallace · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Agus Handoko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · MTC - Wallace · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Agus Handoko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · MTC - Nimityongskul/Cabral · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Farzam Bayat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · MTC - Nimityongskul/Cabral · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeffrey Denson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · Oakwood - Cabral/Kendall · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with James LaRose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · MTC - Wallace · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-23 · MTC - Nimityongskul/Cabral · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Luke Cabral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams61 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
40.3%
25W–37L · 46.6% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 35.3% of games
6.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 47.6% of games
7.5
0%
0W–8L · 29% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova