← Search

David Glasgow

Gaithersburg, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 31W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add David Glasgow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
Eric Duer
2026-08-04 · McKeon · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
Eric Duer
2026-08-02 · McKeon · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · McKeon · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · McKeon · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · McKeon · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · McKeon - Defenders · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Majed Hamawy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Majed Hamawy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · ACERs MoCo Men's 18+. · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · ACERs MoCo Men's 18+. · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bill Keating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Majed Hamawy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-22 · ACERs MoCo Men's 18+. · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bill Keating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-18 · McKeon - Defenders · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Majed Hamawy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 54.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.9% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 76.5% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams