← Search

Rebecca Little

— year-end
489 matches · 244W–245L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Little to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history489 matches
W
2026-06-04 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicole Sorrentino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-2
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Unick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamaica Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-11 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Unick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-07 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-27 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Garlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-26 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Unick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-20 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lance Allgower mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamaica Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Teams90 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 49.7% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
68.6%
94W–43L · 57.9% of games
4.0
35.5%
70W–127L · 44.1% of games
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.9% of games
8.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 43.1% of games
7.0mixed
43.8%
14W–18L · 48.3% of games
7.5mixed
60%
12W–8L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
39.1%
18W–28L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
161 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
159 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
116 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
35 matches
#2 Singles
3%
12 matches
#1 Singles
1%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova