← Search

Janea Schaeffer

Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 26W–15L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Janea Schaeffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · Kellogg/Grassle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-1
W
2026-04-26 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-12 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-15 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · Moore/Wheeler (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-04 · Hammond (F) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
63.3%
19W–11L · 57.7% of games
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 49% of the time
#1 Singles
49%
20 matches
#2 Singles
20%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe