← Search

Samuel Charney

— year-end
16 matches · 13W–3L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Samuel Charney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-07-13 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Diamond · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ben Heinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-12 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Diamond · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Zachary Brint
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Diamond · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ben Heinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Diamond · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Fabian Suri-Payer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Diamond · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ben Heinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-27 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Colon · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Indrisano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-05-20 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Colon · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-05-13 · HR:Harvard:Chan/Colon · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Indrisano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-07-09 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Sillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-07-02 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-06-25 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Pugliese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-18 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Guth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
100%
11W–0L · 71.3% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova