← Search

Mike Rayburn

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 90W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Rayburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
W
2026-08-09 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aiko Tamiya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aiko Tamiya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aiko Tamiya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aiko Tamiya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Linebarger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Linebarger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
MARK MILLER / Tom Weeks
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Rasanen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Razeto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dick Lunceford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-05-19 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glen Iwasaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-11 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rasanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-20 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Roma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 56.5% of games
3.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 49.4% of games
6.0
65.9%
27W–14L · 58.2% of games
7.0
22.5%
9W–31L · 39.6% of games
6.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer