← Search

Brian Reidinger

Maple Plain, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 94W–180L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brian Reidinger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Syverson/Kruse · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Syverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Pargal: All Mixed Up · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dawn Reidinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Syverson/Kruse · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Syverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · Pargal: All Mixed Up · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Fischels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Syverson/Kruse · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jon Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Fischels summer 26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Fischels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · Homsey 7.0 Summer 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Paulson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Torres: The Dropshots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Ballentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · Fischels summer 26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dawn Reidinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
Dan Scardino / Jason Thiner
2026-06-25 · Craig/Lassow - S26 Double Bagel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Luke Anderson / Ryan Albu
2026-06-23 · Torres: The Dropshots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-21 · Homsey 7.0 Summer 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
34.4%
43W–82L · 43.9% of games
8.0
34.1%
15W–29L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
48.8%
21W–22L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
25.9%
15W–43L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
166 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
18 matches
#1 Singles
4%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova