← Search

Esther Thompson

Fayetteville, NC
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 12W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Esther Thompson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-04-08 · Lesniak - Gates Four · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mari Lesniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-25 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eimy Rojas deBeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-09-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pia Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynn Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Theresa Jones / Donna Pope
2023-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dawn Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-17 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kerry Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-23 · Hallock - Mazarick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Winona Gee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-08-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2022-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kerry Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Renee Olive
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Mary Rice / Kelley Hester
2022-06-30 · Haugh - Highland · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Joeckel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Mary Rice / Renee Ference
2022-05-26 · Haugh - Highland · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Joeckel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 51.7% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.2% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal