← Search

Thomas le Puillandre

— year-end
75 matches · 45W–30L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Thomas le Puillandre to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-14 · NITA S 35M40d Naperville-Esancy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · NITA S 35M40d Naperville-Esancy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-02 · CDTA W 40&OM3.5 4.Naper Esancy Sun 4:30 $24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · NITA W 35M40c Naperville-Esancy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Dauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Raja Gangavarapu
2026-04-18 · NITA W 35M40c Naperville-Esancy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-02-21 · NITA W 35M40c Naperville-Esancy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · NITA W 35M40c Naperville-Esancy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
L
2025-12-20 · CDTA E 40&OM3.5 6Naper Esancy Sun 4:30 $24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · CDTA E 40&OM3.5 6Naper Esancy Sun 4:30 $24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-4
W
2025-11-15 · NITA E 35M40b Naperville-Esancy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Srikanth Uppala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-11-08 · CDTA E 40&OM3.5 6Naper Esancy Sun 4:30 $24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Geise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
60.9%
42W–27L · 56.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 77% of the time
#1 Singles
77%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer