← Search

Dawn Richardson

Rye, NH
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 11W–10L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dawn Richardson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-02-10 · SFP:NetNinjas:Tall:Tague · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Farah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-13 · SFP:NetNinjas:Tall:Tague · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Madden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-16 · SFP:NetNinjas:Tall:Tague · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Madden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-04-05 · GB:TripleThreat:Tall:Chambers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2022-03-22 · GB:TripleThreat:Tall:Chambers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tami Pike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2021-06-11 · Richardson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
Kate Moran
2020-08-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2020-08-03 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2020-07-18 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-6, 1-0
L
2020-03-10 · GB:ShoreShots:Rankin:Moodey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2020-02-11 · GB:ShoreShots:Rankin:Moodey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Moodey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2020-01-28 · GB:ShoreShots:Rankin:Moodey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tami Pike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
40%
6W–9L · 45.3% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
4 matches
#1 Singles
19%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer