← Search

Lorie Flacker

— year-end
27 matches · 5W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lorie Flacker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Dekalb TC (Jodi Moskowitz)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Freret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-31 · Dekalb TC (Jodi Moskowitz)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Freret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 6-7
L
2025-12-13 · Dekalb TC (Jodi Moskowitz)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Farmaan Judge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-06 · Dekalb TC (Jodi Moskowitz)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carissa Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-12-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Brenda Anderson / Shirlee Brewer
2024-12-07 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Caneer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-23 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Caneer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Bardossy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 6-2
L
2024-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Rosenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
Denisse Oceguera
2023-12-13 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-11-28 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
18.5%
5W–22L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #4 Doubles, 26% of the time
#4 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
6 matches
#2 Singles
22%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal