← Search

Kelly Dempsey

— year-end
101 matches · 55W–46L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kelly Dempsey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Andresen - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Dempsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-15 · Elliott - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Rudman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-08 · Elliott - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Rudman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · Wallace - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Wilks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · Carson - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Hillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-18 · Elliott - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Rudman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-07 · Wallace - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Wilks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · Carson - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Hillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-21 · Wallace - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Wilks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Wallace - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Wilks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-07 · Carson - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-02 · Carson - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 48.6% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.2% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 49% of games
7.5
52%
13W–12L · 51.4% of games
8.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 38.3% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal