← Search

Matt Baldwin

— year-end
210 matches · 123W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matt Baldwin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Moore Woody · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant Woody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · Moore Woody · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-26 · I'd Hit That · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teri Bangasser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · Moore Woody · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neil Molina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · No Fault · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Pappas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · No Fault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · No Fault · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · I'd Hit That · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with JENNIFER BARBER WHITE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · No Fault · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-06 · No Fault · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-22 · No Fault · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-21 · I'd Hit That · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mallory van Horn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams45 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.9% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.8%
37W–16L · 56.3% of games
4.0
53.8%
28W–24L · 49.8% of games
7.0
69.8%
30W–13L · 57.6% of games
8.0
46.3%
25W–29L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams