← Search

Rebecca Mann

Auburn, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 97W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Mann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Linda Blegen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Linda Blegen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Morse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · with Ruthann Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · with Ruthann Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Ikeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-25 · NWW-BETC-Ikeda · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Happy Grove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Linda Blegen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Sue Bonner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-11-02 · BETC-Hollar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Hollar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
68%
34W–16L · 57.1% of games
3.5
48%
24W–26L · 46.5% of games
6.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.7% of games
7.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
32 matches
#1 Singles
12%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal