← Search

Mary Marsh

— year-end
76 matches · 36W–40L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Mary Marsh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2025-07-16 · Quogue, Ameres/Villano · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Agne Rakauskas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-07-14 · Quogue, Villano/Ameres · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-08 · Quogue, Ameres/Villano · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-07 · Quogue, Villano/Ameres · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Villano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-18 · Quogue, Villano/Ameres · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-16 · Quogue, Ameres/Villano · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
L
2025-06-04 · Quogue, Villano/Ameres · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Byrnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-02 · Quogue, Ameres/Villano · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-05-21 · Quogue, Ameres/Villano · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-06-09 · SAC-Marsh/Fernstrom · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janna McDougall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-05-25 · SAC-Marsh/Fernstrom · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Fernstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-04-14 · N OR-SAC-Leake · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristie Leake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Teams18 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.2%
30W–19L · 55.6% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.2% of games
7.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe