← Search

PHILIPP SCHMID

Mercer Island, WA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
56 matches · 16W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add PHILIPP SCHMID to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-05-02 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven DeGracia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
Atanas Koralski - * / Drake Brodahl
2026-04-04 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven DeGracia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2025-02-22 · MI-Yetman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Yetman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-01-18 · MI-Yetman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virl Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-07-01 · MI-Gurney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-17 · MI-Seneker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bharat Maheshwari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2023-02-11 · MI-Seneker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Norden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-01-27 · MI-Seneker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bharat Maheshwari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-01-14 · MI-Seneker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiaohui Lou Luo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-01-08 · MI-Seneker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjiv Parikh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.6% of games
3.5
26.2%
11W–31L · 41.4% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#1 Singles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova