← Search

Elizaveta Hermann

Issaquah, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 41W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizaveta Hermann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-07-25 · EDG-Rock-Mach · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ticson MacH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-18 · EDG-DoubleEdgers-Huang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anton Piskunov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · EDG-DoubleEdgers-Huang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anton Piskunov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · EDG-Rock-Mach · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Hei mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · EDG-DoubleEdgers-Huang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anton Piskunov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · EDG-DoubleEdgers-Huang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anton Piskunov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-23 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 59.6% of games
3.5
34.9%
15W–28L · 46% of games
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
38.9%
14W–22L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#2 Singles
17%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer