← Search

Cee Cee Young

ATLANTIC BEACH, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 46W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cee Cee Young to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-09-12 · The Woods - Tracy · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Ferrari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Tamara Kennedy / Emily Bauchman
2026-08-22 · The Woods - Tracy · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betsy Hegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · The Woods - Tracy · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Creveling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · The Woods - Tracy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cole Aquino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · The Woods - Tracy · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · The Woods - Tracy · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · The Woods - Tracy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Tofflemire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-16 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Kim Johnson
2025-03-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Jarck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Jarck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 63.5% of games
3.5
63.6%
28W–16L · 52.8% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#1 Singles
22%
15 matches
#2 Singles
19%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal