← Search

Shannon Lucas

VANCOUVER, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 19W–13L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Shannon Lucas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-09-13 · CGM-Venezia/Szueber · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-12 · CGM-Locke/Venezia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erin Smiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Delena Palena championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Jaime Venezia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Delena Palena championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delena Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delena Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Robin Browne Hoffman / Dana Alley
2026-03-29 · CGM-Damiano/Rakoz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Larissa Kazantsev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-02-07 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delena Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · CGM-Rakoz/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 62.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.4% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 67.2% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#2 Singles
13%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert