← Search

Laura Beber

Greenwich, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
297 matches · 165W–132L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Laura Beber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history297 matches
L
2026-08-11 · #3 Doubles · with Alicia Cintron championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-30 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Felisse Starker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angelika Leissl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Felisse Starker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Pedersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Kozak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Cintron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · Coveleigh Club 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Mary Herrington / Kristen Hulme
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mila Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-24 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Cintron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-15 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Eickelbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63%
85W–50L · 54.4% of games
3.5
34.6%
18W–34L · 43.7% of games
6.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.4% of games
7.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
46.4%
13W–15L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
115 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
87 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova