← Search

Helen Kelly

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 64W–33L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Helen Kelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-09-13 · MI-Brick · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Delyse Dickinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · MI-Kaestle · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Naomi Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Emer Hensey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Emer Hensey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Emer Hensey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · MI-Flume · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-21 · MI-Flume · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emer Hensey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · MI-Flume · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · MI-Holtzclaw · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · MI-Holtzclaw · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with CECI BISSONNETTE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-01 · MI-Holtzclaw · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-09 · MI-Flume · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 69.3% of games
3.5
61.5%
32W–20L · 55.3% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.5% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King