← Search

Sabra Szczyglowski

— year-end
197 matches · 91W–106L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Sabra Szczyglowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Walker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Rawls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · Phung · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Lebow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · Phung · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Louden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · Phung · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Lebow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Phung · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Lebow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · Cappello · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Huntington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Riedinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-24 · Serving You · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denese Cavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Donna Jones championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Shannon Biggs / Elizabeth Smith
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Denise Milligan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Gail Shenk / Michelle Shipley
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Denise Milligan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Walker · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Curry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams78 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.7% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
71.2%
37W–15L · 59.2% of games
3.5
30.8%
16W–36L · 43.2% of games
6.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 62% of games
6.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 46.6% of games
7.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 45.2% of games
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams