← Search

Jim Keen

Richmond Hill, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 24W–22L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jim Keen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-08-27 · RH - Burns · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · RH - Burns · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · RH - Burns · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · RH - Burns · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · RH - Burns · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mike Kecken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · RH - Burns · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · RH - Burns · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-03-26 · RH - Dittmer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marco Navarro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-19 · RH - Dittmer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · RH - Dittmer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-26 · RH - Dittmer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · RH - Dittmer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Bromm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 49.8% of games
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 67% of the time
#2 Doubles
67%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert