← Search

Lauren Ratcliff

— year-end
101 matches · 47W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lauren Ratcliff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Jeter · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Rhonda Brown / Carrie Coursey
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Dorcas Gonzales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Tammy Bray / Benjamin Burnett
2026-06-17 · Jackson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · with Dorcas Gonzales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Shana Jeter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Shana Jeter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
Kelly Nieves / Beckie Taylor
2026-04-28 · Ratcliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camryn Bintz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Kirsten Hancock / Jennifer Crow
2026-04-14 · Ratcliff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camryn Bintz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · Ratcliff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Melissa Meyer / Amy Gaston
2026-03-24 · Ratcliff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deedee Albertin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Jana Kuz / Kelly Nieves
2026-03-10 · Ratcliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Laughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-03 · Ratcliff · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
49%
25W–26L · 52.7% of games
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 42.7% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.5% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 27.9% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
14%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova