← Search

Teresa Scodeller

— year-end
22 matches · 10W–12L · seasons 2019–2020

Captains: add Teresa Scodeller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2020-08-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachelle Beazley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
W
Elyse Germack / Susan Margulis
2020-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Siersma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-0
L
2020-08-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Analia Bomrad- Saez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2020-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Borovsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2020-08-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2020-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Wertheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Carolyn Sprague / Julie Wasco
2019-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Sheryl Shenefelt / Sarah Cvetanovski
2019-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Borovsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2019-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Meadows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Joan Rappley / Deborah Lujan
2019-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hillary Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
Julie Wasco / Susan Hartrick
2019-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Siersma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2019-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Trivax Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.3% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer